Factors Affecting Participation with Sustainability

Factors Affecting Participation with SustainabilityParticipation is an essential factor of increase and the degree of affaire in development programs is a key fruit determinant of success or failure. According to Bagherian et al. (2009) the activites and factors which contribute with success of particiption soundless unkown and remind a mystery. But some researchers and scholars studied communitys confederation and modify factors in development ciphers they found some key factors which simulate muckles intimacy. There ar a variety of factors affecting topical anesthetic participation in development programmes and assures such as economic, policy-making, legislative, administrative, socio- heathenish, and geographical factors. Furthermore, closing off and scattered habitat of the poor people work load, especi solelyy for women, flimsy health condition, low level of education and exposure to non local information, unclouded leaders and overlook of know-how to move in this direction in effect to promote their interests. (Heck, 2003Cohen Uphoff, 1980 UNDP, 2007 Oakley, 1991).Heck (2003) added some factors and constraints of implementing and support agencies centralized planning, decision making and implementation, lack of skilled staff to promote participation and pressure from the side of implementing establishment and supporting organizations to produce visible results quickly.Economic factors Mohammad (2010) asserts that economic factors extremely affects peoples participation, which they are bound to live and adjusted. He added that socially poor, minorities and underprivileged communities rarely asked for participation in political sympathies lead programs and projects. For the best result, it could be crucial to get by and engage individuals and minorities from different levels in the leadership structure of the community. As breakwater et al. (2005) cited that Leaders must make every effort to recruit and command people of both raci al and ethnic diversity and with lower socioeconomic status as their interests and concerns should not be ignored (155). semipolitical factors Political factors affect peoples participation in different ways. One of the main causes of unbiassed situation of people participation in developing countries is political obstacle. Samad (2002) explained that beside of the socioeconomic stance, political background of stakeholders has been an influential factor in the form of participation consequence. He added that those stakeholders, who are politically, socially and economically dominate, for their own interest may frustrate the participation of others (cited in Mohammad, 2010). Heck (2003) stated that in number of countries the hobnailed and urban elites influence the political and administrative structures to turn the policies in their favor.Socio-cultural factors In some communities, culture directly affects people participation in development projects. Afghanistani community is mavin of them, which culture is a big challenge for minorities especially women participation. Likewise, Cohen and Uphoff (1980) hinted in their compressive model of peoples participation in rural development that culture is one of three big challenges which affect peoples participation in development initiatives. Beyond all these factors in some cases, people do not want to accede in development projects.For more effective participation some pragmatic steps are very important which include demanded-led idea for project or program, ensuring that the design is thought of as an investment in a successful startcome and thus given adequate time and other resources, the design incorporates specific activities and resources needed to implement participatory strategies, distinctly specifying the taper group who and which groups to be participated and who will benefit, defining the type and level of participation to be achieved and selecting skilled team in participatory approaches (A usAID, 2010).Brahmi and Thakur (2011) undertook a consume to find socio-economicfactors which affecting peoples participation in the Hariyali project in Himachal Pardesh, India. For mull over data were stash away from 71 people who were involved in the project and 428 farmers through survey. The field of operation findings showed total 22 factors noticed by respondents which affects peoples participation from these 22 factors 18 were socio-economic factors. The key factors were lack of sensory faculty about programmes, poor economic conditions, illiteracy, lack of faith in government programmes, village politics, subsidy culture, lack of exposure visits, low interest in money contribution, lack of demonstration and transparency. About 90 percent of the respondents sensed that lack of awareness (i.e. Knowledge of project concepts, objectives and their benefits, guidelines and responsibilities of the user group) were the most con judge factors. The study also revealed some prog ram related factors such as lack of entry point activities, lack of flexibility in intake according to field conditions, variation in wage payments and lack of provision of advance payments.Similarly, Nxumalo and Oladele (2013) examined factors affecting farmers participation in agricultural program in Zululand district, South Africa. Three municipalities and 90 people were randomly selected. information were collected through structured questionnaire, frequency count, percentages and the probit regression model were used for analysis. The study showed that farmers were inclined to participation, but luck of fund, unavailability of land, limited resources were major factors for participation.Bagherian et al. (2009) conducted a study to trace the factors which influencing local peoples participation in Watershed Management Programs (WMP) in Iran. Two hundred respondents were questioned through in-person interview, correlation and multiple regression were employed for data analyse s. The finding exhibit that the level of people participation was moderate. Regression findings showed five factors had impact on the level of participation of people in this program. These factors were level of peoples satisfaction of prior programs, peoples attitude toward WMP, peoples knowledge of WMP, their monthly income from alternative occupation and their expectations of WMP.Despite of many problems in Afghanistan two main obstacles bugger off been encountered by National Solidarity Program (NSP) which highly effects peoples participation. First, security problems, due to ongoing negate in some parts of the country, it has been difficult to contract facilitating peoples participation in such areas has been in danger. This has resulted in a tedious pace of programme implementation. Second, local governments and elite of communities, in some regions have interfered in development projects which have brought obstacles for peoples participation (NSP, 2010).Dufour and Antezar (2003) carried out a research to analyze participation and consultation of affected populationin Nahrin district, Baghlan, Afghanistan. Data were collected from the local population, Afghan aid workers, international aid workers and the Afghan interim authorities. For data collection different tools were used such as interview with formal and informal focus groups, visits, participation in meetings, and appraise of secondary sources. The study showed some contextual factors, for instance security, geography, social characteristics, cultural factors and interference of local power holders.The key factors which affect sustainability have been sorted under nine main headings, namely partner government and conferrer policies, local participation and ownership, management and organization, finance, awareness and training, technology, socio-culture, environment and external political and economical factors (AusAID, 2000).Sahee foundation1(2008) conducted a study to find sustainability o f rural development projects in Swaziland. Fifty six rural development projects were surveyed correlation had been tested, used the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Kendall Rank correlation. The findings revealed that the project is not an effortless way to earn wealth with little effort and input. People awareness about their responsibilities, working of informal persons hand to hand with other members of the project for achieving the common aim promising lead projects to sustainability. Furthermore, the study showed that cooperation between implementing NGOs, beneficiaries and local authorities were mostly comforting or even good. Despite of these positive points achieving stable membership was one of the big difficulties in most of the projects. In most cases the membership shrank until a small core group remained. Some projects ended because NGOs had stopped visit projects after completion due to lack of fund and the beneficiaries had no happening to improve their skills and deve lop their project.1 Sahee Sustainability for Agriculture, Health, Education and Environment (2008)