Modern Political Thought

School of administration and International Relations groundbreaking governmental concept II POL206 2012-13 Module Convenor Dr Madeleine Davis Email m. j. telecommunicateprotected ac. uk Office hours Semester 1 Thurs twenty-four hours 2-3pm, Friday 11-12am, Semester 2 atomic number 90 23pm, Friday 1-2pm. Office location Arts One, Room 2. 28b Timetable Lectures Thursdays at 10 am Seminars Thursdays (see QM+ and School notice board for details) 1 1. pick up from the convenor This module enchiridion provides you with necessity in random variableation. The handbook details the topics cover each week.You should usance the exercise lists provided to help you prep be for lectures and seminars. You should read the handbook cargon copiousy onward you begin the module, and you should bring it with you of on the whole timey week to lectures and seminars. The first few pages give you roughly general information and advice on how the module forget be taught and assessed, as well as guidelines on preparing and presenting your fashion. The rest of the handbook is a guide to module content, including a week by week guide to lecture and seminar themes, with essential and additional renditions clearly indicated for each topic.Copies of this module depict and separate handouts atomic number 18 available from the folders on the wall outside the School Office on the minute floor of the Arts Building. The module outline for the spring semester entrust be available at the end of the autumn semester. Announcements relating to the module willing be distributed via email to your QM email account or via QM+, and it is your responsibility if you miss any of these announcements. at that place will be a hebdomadal lecture for the module at 10 am on Thursdays. Seminars to a fault take place on Thursday and you will be assigned to one of these. . Module description This second form core module is compulsory for all government activity and Politics/History students , beca procedure we think an understanding of the history, structures and main c formerlypts of semi policy-making view is necessary for appreciating the institutions and arguments of young semipolitical life, as you will study it in other modules. The skills you learn in dealing with more abstract and normative ideas, as well as in evaluating rational arguments, ar also essential for studying all parts of the discipline.The module builds on the analysis of concepts and ideologies begun in POL100 insertion to Politics, but it also offers an hazard to read some of the classic texts, and to explore some of the founding ideas, of modern political conjecture. By studying the foundations and progressment of political ruling, we goat understand how coetaneous ways of thinking about politics and the political emerged, as well as appreciating the historic and theoretical contexts in which they evolved.The emphasis in the module will be on a diminutive reading and analysis of pr imary texts. Part I of the course (MPT I) foc manipulationd on the development of political thought prior to the French Revolution, emphasising in particular the kindly contract tradition foundational ideas about rational individualism the quest for a theory of political responsibility which would grant legitimacy to the emerging modern state the development of radical theories of democratic participation and popular sovereignty and the critique of many of these developments in modern conservatism.It also raised questions about how we think of the political, by comparing the social contract tradition with that of Machiavelli and by considering politics in the context of the development of modernity. Concepts care consent, freedom, equality, rights and property were prominent. In Part II of the course, we will be considering the way in which political thought developed in the wake of the French and industrial revolutions. We will begin by focusing upon the go on rise of better- lookingism and secularism in the 18th and 19th centuries in the work of Jeremy 2Bentham, tush Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. These figures represent the continued elaboration and sophistication of the modern foundations of political society in concepts of rationalism, enlightenment, freedom and equality. As we will see, their conceptions of the role of the state, of right and of duty continue to be immensely authoritative in both political thought and practice today. For the rest of the module we will turn our attention to Germany and iii great German thinkers Hegel, Marx and Nietzsche.This will allow you the opportunity to study three of the nineteenth-centurys central political thinkers, whose ideas devote landed a crucial role in the development of the twentieth century. Hegels compositions may not at first seem easy to understand as they are written in a sprint that is highly metaphysical and abstract. However, once we get beyond the philosophical jargon we discover one of the most compelling visions of the relationship between citizens and the state that has ever been offered.For Hegel, the state was the actuality of the ethical idea, and it was through the solid ground that the individual acquires what he describes as substantive freedom. The critiques of liberalism developed by Marx and Nietzsche are the most influential we have. Attacking the real foundations of the emerging liberal capitalist companionship, they also dismissed its values and aspirations to justice as at best illusory and at worst, as masquerades for advancing atomal interests.For them, liberal democracy is about oppression and exploitation (Marx), nihilism and deathly mediocrity (Nietzsche), not justice and emancipation. They developed very unlike ideas from liberal ones, about tender-hearted nature and what might be good for it. They also developed grand historical accounts to explain what they saw as the miseries and decomposition of modernity (capitalism nihilism), al ongside more visionary allusions as to how we might escape from them.Above all, Marx and Nietzsche sought to challenge the idea that politics is a rational practice undertaken by self-conscious actors who exculpate rational decisions and subscribe to general values of fairness. What they describe is a far more complex environment in which politics is an current struggle between (structural, cultural, unconscious) forces of which we often have little understanding and even less control. This designates that they pay less attention to the State than more formulaic political theorists, since the strength struggles that constitute political life are much more widespread.This clearly has signifi cornerstonet implications for the practising of politics and through them, Marx and Nietzsche oblige us once more to take up the first semesters questions concerning the bases (or lack of them) for political potency, divided values or any common vision of justice or liberation. 3. princip le and Learning Profile a) Teaching Arrangements Lecturers Madeleine Davis (MD), Jeremy Jennings (JJ), Caroline Williams (CW) and Clare Woodford (CWd) Seminar teachers Madeleine Davis, Caroline Williams and Clare Woodford The module has two components a one hour weekly ecture and a one hour weekly seminar. Attendance at all lectures and seminars is compulsory. Persistent non-attendance can lead to 3 de-registration, which can attain your overall classification or prevent your studying advance with tabby bloody shame. If you are absent due to ill health you should assemble the module double-decker and the obligation. If you are absent from power Mary for more than five-spot days, you mustinessiness supply a doctors note. Lectures there will be twenty-two weekly lectures, as diminutive in the module outline below. These will take place on Thursdays at 10 am. You should ensure that you attend all of these.Lectures are captured on audio and video, and you can find them on QM+ . Seminars these are held once a week and also at long last one hour. They are small group meetings based around specified texts and themes, and they are intend to supplement the lectures and provide an opportunity for deeper word of honor of the module content. You MUST do the want preparatory reading in advance of the seminar. tout ensemble participants are anticipate to demonstrate a careful reading for the weeks topic and a willingness and office to contribute to class watchword on the basis of such reading.You can entirely demonstrate reading and thinking through making invariable contributions to class discussions. The class tutors will endeavour to make sure that everybody regularizes something in every seminar. Since seminars are designed to allow you to make an input into the module, attendance is compulsory. cheer note that non-attendance at seminars can lead to deregistration from the module (see undergraduate handbook). Please let the seminar tutor know in a dvance if you are unable to attend a seminar, and please ensure that you speak to the module convenor or your in the flesh(predicate) tutor if you are experiencing problems.Because texts are open to various interpretations and reprovals, seminars in this module provide an especially classic forum for seeing out your ideas, testing them on other readers, and most importantly, raising rockyies that arose during your reading. You should never feel intimidated in these classes, in expressing your ideas speculative thinking is an important part of political theorising and it is not a question of being right or wrong. Above all, it is important that you should come to class with an enquiring mind and a willingness to share your questions, problems and opinions with other members of the tutorial.Class discussions are for your usefulness and the more you put into them, the more stimulating and helpful youll find them. In fact, the best MPT sessions often arise from students identifyin g parts of texts they found the most difficult or controversial, rather than those parts which are more self-evident. Never feel inhibited about asking the meaning of words or passages the chances are that other pack are also struggling with them It is important that you should bring a replicate of the weeks primary text with you, as we may want to disassemble particular passages together.QM+ and email it is important that you check the POL206 area on QM+ regularly. Not only will we post announcements and handouts there, but we will also involve QM+ in the teaching of the module. impertinent students dont come unprepared to class because they have forgotten to check QM+. You must also read your Queen Mary email daily for any communications about teaching. The School will not use any other email but that supplied by the Queen Mary. Failure to respond to email messages, particularly regarding non-attendance, may lead to deregistration. b) Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria The aims of the module are To give students a broad overview of modern political thinking as it developed from the 16th century to the end of the 20th century to encourage a capacity in analytical thinking and an ability to deal with abstract concepts and normative or speculative ideas to introduce a critical perspective which encourages rigorous and creative thinking and to teach skills which are derived from a text-based module and to introduce intensive and continuous composition assignments in order to develop students writing abilities and powers of written analysis.The learning objectives of the module are The acquisition of a detailed knowledge of classic texts in political theory an ability to explain and critically analyse the basic claims and normative ideas underlying modern political doctrines a familiarity with the central concepts of modern political thought, such as rights, justice, human nature, indecorum, equality, democracy, exploitation, as well as the idea of t he political itself, as these have developed discursively and historically and an appreciation of how political theory both understands, and responds to, the questions of odernity and the modern state. Skills The module aims to teach the following(a) skills analytic skills in close readings of texts skills of critical military rating in considering arguments speculative skills in thinking about the big questions in politics presentation skills in summarising complex theoretical arguments and writing skills in presenting critical written accounts of ideas covered and reflecting on the students own work. c) Attendance Attendance at all Lectures and Seminars is compulsory.Persistent non attendance can lead to de-registration, which can affect your overall classification or prevent your studying further with Queen Mary. If you are absent due to ill health you should contact the module tutor and the office. If you are absent from Queen Mary for more than 5 days you must supply a doctors note. d) Participation/Preparation This handbook details the topics covered each week. You should use the reading lists provided to help you prepare for lectures and seminars. You can only demonstrate reading and thinking through making regular contributions to class discussions. e) Communication You must read your Queen Mary email for any communications about teaching daily. The School will not use any other email but that supplied by the Queen Mary. Failure to respond to email messages, particularly regarding non-attendance, may lead to deregistration. You must check this QM+ position for this module for any messages and associated learning material. 4. Assessment Profile and Timetable for feedback (see also Appendix 1) a) Assessment In the spring semester, assessment for this module consists of the following two pieces of work (i) an experiment proposal of max. 00 words, plus working bibliography (weighting 10% of the mark for the whole year) and (ii) a question strive of ma x. d0 words (weighting 50% of the mark for the whole year). The research essay is designed to allow you to demonstrate both depth and breadth in your understanding of the semesters key themes and thinkers. It is also mean to help develop your skills of research design and independent research, in order to prepare you for the final year dissertation you will undertake next year.You will be required to choose one from a selection of key themes, and to write an essay that compares and analyses the treatment of your elect theme by at least three of the thinkers covered in this module. The choice of thinkers will depend on the theme chosen and your own interests, with one stipulation at least two must be chosen from the Spring Semester (for Semester B associates all will be chosen from the Spring Semester). The themes from which to choose are i) freedom, ii) human nature, iii) moral philosophy, iv) equality, v) political authority and legitimacy.The requirement to set back a plan and working bibliography is intended to ensure that your choice of themes and thinkers is appropriate, to help you in material body your arguments, and to give you the opportunity to receive feedback on your work in progress from your seminar tutor. Your tutors may also incorporate picayune writing exercises into classes to help you link themes and thinkers as we progress through the course. Deadlines Essay proposal Thursday 7 March ( week 9) Feedback will be given in week 11. Research essay Tuesday 23 April. Grades and feedback will be given after(prenominal) the exam period.Please advert to the Appendix for further information and guidance about the coursework. Exam thither is no exam for this module. 6 Semester B associate students Those taking MPT II only will have 100% of their grade awarded on the basis of their spring semester course work. The coursework is as follows (i) an essay proposal of max. 500 words, plus working bibliography (weighting 15% of the mark) and (ii) a re search essay of max. 5000 words (weighting 85% of the mark). The coursework is due on the same dates as for nonassociate students.See Appendices for full details. b) Submission of coursework You must submit one electronic copy of all assignments. Your electronic copy must be submitted via Queen Marys Virtual Learning environment (QMPlus) by 9am on the day of the stated deadline. The School has a policy of anonymous marking. Your name must not appear anywhere on your work. Therefore, you must ensure that you use the coursework coversheet as the first page of your assignment. Any coursework work submitted which does not have a coversheet attached will incur penalties for incorrect submission.Coversheets can be downloaded from the Undergraduate shared area of QMPlus and through individual QMPlus module areas Your electronic copy must be submitted by 9am on the deadline date, and will be retained and screened by anti-plagiarism software. recall Save your assignment with coversheet and bibliography as a single document (preferably as a PDF) before uploading to QMPlus Complete the coversheet with your bookman ID, Module Code, Assignment number and Seminar Tutor. Your assignments must be submitted by 9am on the deadline date Save back-up copies of all your work in case of computer failure.It is your responsibility to submit your assignments correctly. (Full details of submission policies can be found in the Schools Student Handbook. ) c) Extensions If you require an extension due to extenuating circumstances (EC), you must complete the relevant EC form and attach documentation to support your request. Completed forms and documentation should be handed into the Office. Full details can be found in the Student Handbook 7 Essays submitted 14 days after the deadline including weekends will not be assessed and will be given a mark of zero. d) Essay AdviceReferencing and bibliography There are different ways of referencing and making a bibliography. The important thing is that you use one, and that you use it consistently. Referencing and bibliography are essential parts of any essay and mark will be deducted if they are poor or absent. Your seminar teacher will be happy to answer questions about this. For details about how to reference and make a bibliography, please consult the Student Handbook. e) Past Exam Paper There is no exam for this course. 5. QM+ All module materials, including a copy of this module outline can be found on QMPlus.You should familiarise yourself with QMPlus as soon as possible as further information concerning this module and office hours will be posted there. To access QMPlus (on or off campus) go to http//qmplus. qmul. ac. uk/. You will require your QM computer access username and password. You should also use QMPlus to upload the electronic version your assignments. If you are having problems accessing/using QMPlus support and information can be found on the following website http//qmplus. qmul. ac. uk/mod/page/view. php? id=85646 Equally you can contact the School Office who may be able to offer serve upance.NOTE If you have not completed your module registration properly your modules will not say on QMPlus. It is up to you to ensure you complete registration and check QMplus regularly. 6. Plagiarism QM delimits plagiarism as presenting someone elses work as ones own irrespective of intention. Close paraphrasing, copying from the work of another person, including another student, using the ideas of another person, without proper acknowledgement or repeating work you have previously submitted without properly referencing yourself (known as self plagiarism) also constitute plagiarism. Regulations on Assessment Offences 8 Plagiarism is a serious offence and all students suspected of plagiarism will be subject to an investigation. If found guilty, penalties can include failure of the module to suspension or permanent withdrawal from Queen Mary. It is your responsibility to ensure that you under stand plagiarism and how to bend it. The recommendations below can help you in avoiding plagiarism. Be sure to record your fountains when taking notes, and to cite these if you use ideas or, especially, quotations from the original source.Be particularly careful if you are cutting and pasting information between two documents, and ensure that references are not lost in the process. Be commonsensible in referencing ideas commonly held views that are generally accepted do not always require acknowledgment to particular sources. However, it is best to be safe to avoid plagiarism. Be particularly careful with quotations and paraphrasing. Be aware that technology is now available at Queen Mary and elsewhere that can automatically let on plagiarism. Ensure that all works used are referenced appropriately in the text of your work and fully credited in your bibliography.If in doubt, ask for further guidance from your adviser or module tutor. See your student handbook for further advice . 9 7. LECTURE AND SEMINAR SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lecture Benthams Utilitarianism (JJ) canful Stuart Mills Liberalism (JJ) Kants Enlightenment (CWd) Hegel philosophy, ethics and the state (CWd) The early Marx (MD) Marxs historical materialism (MD) tuition week no lectures or seminars The Analysis of Capitalism (MD) Introduction to Nietzsche and the family tree of worship (CW) Nietzsches family tree and Bad Conscience (CW) Nietzsches family tree and Nihilism (CW) Conclusion and overview (MD)Seminar theme Bentham principles of morals and legislation John Stuart Mill liberty Kant enlightenment and freedom Hegel and the state Marx emancipation, alienation and speciesbeing Marx history, class and revolution Marx capitalism and exploitation Nietzsches challenge what is morality? Nietzsche guilt, bad conscience, discipline and will to power Nietzsche nihilism and beyond Advice on preparing your research essay revel NOTE THAT THERE WILL BE A BRIEFING SESSION ON THE pe rspicacity REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL STUDENTS ON THURSDAY 18 JANUARY AT 1PM IN ROOM FB113A 10 8. READING GUIDESEMESTER II TEXTS Core Texts Jeremy Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (in Wootton). John Stuart Mill, On closeness (in Wootton). Kant, An Answer to the Question What is Enlightenment? (in Wootton). G. W. F. Hegel, Elements of the Philosophy of right field (Cambridge Cambridge University wish, 1991). Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels various texts, including excerpts from On the Judaic Question, The 1844 Manuscripts, The German political theory, The Communist Manifesto and Capital , lay in in Wootton or Robert C. Tucker, The Marx-Engels Reader, 2nd edition (New York W.W. Norton, 1978). Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of holiness, ed. Keith Ansell-Pearson, trans. Carol Diethe (Cambridge Cambridge University crushed leather, 2007). As far as is possible, all of the first and second semester readings are equanimous in David Wootton (ed. ), Modern semipolitical judgement. developments from Machiavelli to Nietzsche (Cambridge Hackett, 1996) (referred to below as Wootton you may also use the second edition from 2008). Students are strongly advised to purchase this text. Where texts are not in Wootton they will be posted on the QM+ site for the course.Most of these texts can also be found on the internet, although the quality varies. Secondary texts An important note on secondary reading As last semester, the major emphasis of this course is on a close reading of primary texts. All the essential reading for seminars is from the core primary texts listed above. However you will need to consult secondary texts when planning and preparing your research essay (you can also, of course, use them for seminar planning in addition to never instead of the primary reading if you have time).The secondary material listed below is organised into various categories general texts useful ally texts aimed at students and usually covering several thinkers and one or more relevant themes. secondary texts on particular thinkers more in depth and specialized treatments of each thinker. additional thematic sources some suggestions for general reading on the themes for the research essay. 11 Your working bibliography for the research essay will probably submit material from each of these categories. We have provided a fairly extensive range of sources here.All should be available in the QM library (some are still on order at the time of compiling this list). Useful secondary texts (* indicates particularly recommended) General secondary texts Barry, N. , Modern policy-making Theory (4th ed, 2000) (chapters on authority, freedom and equality) Boucher, D. and P. Kelly (eds. ), policy-making Thinkers (London Routledge, 2003). *Edwards, A. and J. Townsend (eds. ), understand Modern policy-making Philosophy. From Machiavelli to Marx (Basingstoke Palgrave, 2002). (useful chapters on Kant, Hegel, Mill and Marx) * Hampsher-Monk, I. A History of Modern Political Thought (Oxford Blackwell, 1992) (chapters on Bentham, Mill, Hegel and Marx) Macpherson, C. B. , The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism (Oxford Oxford University Press, 1964). ( a critique of liberalism) Matravers, D. et al. , Reading Political Philosophy. Machiavelli to Mill (London Routledge, 2001). *Pateman, C. , The Problem of Political Obligation (Cambridge Polity, 1985). Plamenatz, J. , Man and Society Political and companionable Theories from Machiavelli to Marx (New York Longman, 1991). Ramsay, M. ,Whats Wrong with liberalism? (1997) Rorty, R. et al. (eds. ), Philosophy in History Essays in the Historiography of Philosophy (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1984). *Rosen, M. , and Wolff, J. , Political Thought (OPU, 1999) (a very useful reader of primary texts organised by themes including human nature, apology of political rule, and liberty, with short insane asylums to each theme) Wolff, J. , An Introduction to Political Philosophy (Oxford Oxford University Press, 1996). By thinker Bentham, Mill and Utilitarianism David Bromwich and George Kateb (eds), John Stuart Mill On Liberty (New Haven Yale University Press, 2003).Wendy Donner, The Liberal Self John Stuart Mills Moral and Political Philosophy (Ithaca Cornell University Press, 1991). Michael B. Gill, The British Moralists on Human Nature and the Birth of Secular Ethics (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 2006). *John Gray, Mill on Liberty A Defence, 2nd edition (London Routledge, 1996). Joseph Hamburger, John Stuart Mill on Liberty and Control (Princeton Princeton University Press, 1999). *Ian Hampsher-Monk, A History of Modern Political Thought (Oxford Blackwell, 1992), chapters 7 and 8.Will Kymlicka, Contemporary Political Philosophy An Introduction, 2nd ed. (Oxford Oxford University Press, 2002), chapter 2. 12 John Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA Belknap Press, 1971), 5, 26-30. Nancy Rosenblum, Benthams Theory of the Modern State (Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press, 1978). Alan Ryan, The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill, 2nd edition (Basingstoke Macmillan, 1978). Geoffrey Scarre, Utilitarianism (London Routledge, 1996). Philip Schofield, Utility and Democracy The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham (Oxford Oxford University Press, 2006)..John Skorupski, John Stuart Mill (London Routledge, 1989). John Skorupski (ed. ), The Cambridge Companion to John Stuart Mill (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1998). J. J. C. Smart and Bernhard Williams, Utilitarianism for and against (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1973). John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism, in On Liberty and Other Essays, ed. John Gray (Oxford Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 131-201. Kant Useful Introductions Scruton, R. (2001) Kant A Very Short Introduction, Oxford Oxford University Press Filkshuh, K. A. (2003 2nd ed. 2009) Kant in Boucher, D. and Kelly, P. eds) Political Thinkers From Socrates to the Present, Oxford Oxford U niversity Press, pp. 422-36 P. Guyer, The Cambridge companion to Kant P. Guyer The Cambridge Companion to Kant and modern philosophy (2006) H. Williams, Kants Political philosophy S. M. Shell, The Rights of reason A study of Kants Philosophy and Politics R. Beiner (ed), Kant and political Philosophy H. Arendt, Lectures on Kants Political Philosophy P. Riley, Will and Political Legitimacy L. Krieger, The German Idea of independence G. A. Kelly, Idealism, Politics, and History Reiss, H. S. (ed. ) (1991) Kants Political Writings, (2nd ed. (H. B. Nisbet trans. ) Cambridge Cambridge University Press too useful for commentaries and discussion Allison, H. (2004 ed) Kants Transcendental Idealism An Interpretation and Defence, London and New Haven, CT Yale University Press Ameriks, K. (2000 ed) Kants Theory of Mind, Oxford Clarendon Press Beck, L. W. (1960) A explanation on Kants Critique of Practical Reason, Chicago Caygill, H. (1995) A Kant Dictionary, Oxford Blackwell Collins, A. (1999 ) Possible Experience Understanding Kants Critique of Pure Reason Berkeley and Los Angeles University of California Press Downie, R. S. and Telfer, E. 1969) Respect for Persons, Allen and Unwin Filkshuh, K. A. (2003 2nd ed. 2009) Kant in Boucher, D. and Kelly, P. (ed. s) Political Thinkers From Socrates to the Present, Oxford Oxford University Press, pp. 422-36 Gardner, S. (1999) Routledge Philosophy puffbook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason, (London Routledge) 13 Keller, P. (2001) Kant and the Demands of disquiet Cambridge Cambridge University Press Kitcher, P. (1982) Kant on Self-Identity, The Philosophical limited review, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 41-72 Kitcher, P. (1999) Kant on Self-Consciousness, The Philosophical Review, vol. 08, no. 3, pp. 345-386 Korsgaard, C. (1996) Creating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge Cambridge University Press Sircello, G. (1968) Subjectivity and Justification in Aesthetic Judgements, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3-12 Wolff, R. P. (ed. ) (1967) Kant A Collection of captious Essays, Garden City, NY Doubleday Anchor a useful collection Hegel Useful Introductions Singer, P. (1983) Hegel a very short introduction, Oxford Oxford University Press Patten, A. (2003 2nd ed. 2009) Hegel in Boucher, D. and Kelly, P. (ed. ) Political Thinkers from Socrates to the Present, Oxford Oxford University Press, pp. 437-58 Knowles, D. (2002) Hegel and the Philosophy of Right, New York Routledge An keen text. Really useful for situating Hegels knowledge in context. Very clearly written. Also useful * Hampsher-Monk, I. A History of Modern Political Thought (Oxford Blackwell, 1992), * Patten, A. Hegels Idea of Freedom (Oxford Oxford University Press, 1999). * Wood, A. W. Editors Introduction, in G. W. F. Hegel, Elements of the Philosophy of Right (CUP 1991) * Burns, A. G. W. F.Hegel, in Terrell Carver and James Martin (eds), Continental Wood, A. W. Hegels Ethical Thought (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 19 90). Ameriks, K. (1985) Hegels Critique of Kants Theoretical Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol. XLVI, no. I, pp. 1-35 Haddock, B. G. W. F Hegel Philosophy of Right, in Murray Forsyth and (eds), The Political Classics A Guide to the Essential Texts from Hamilton to Mill, Vol. 2 (Oxford Oxford University Press, 1993). Beiser, F. (2005) Hegel, London Routledge Berenson, F. (1982) Hegel on Others and the Self, Philosophy, vol. 57, no. 19, pp,77-90 Taylor, C. Hegel and Modern Society (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1979). Taylor, C. Hegel, (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1977). Di Giovanni, G. and Harris, H. S. (eds) (1985) Between Kant and Hegel, Albany SUNY Press Harris, H. S. (1995) Hegel Phenomenology and System, Indianapolis Hackett Houlgate, S. (1991) Freedom, Truth, History And introduction to Hegels Philosophy, London Routledge Ritter, J. Hegel and the French Revolution Essays on The Philosophy of Right (Cambridge MIT Press, 1984). Mccarney, J . Hegel on History, (London Routledge, 2000). Habermas, J.Knowledge and Human Interests, trans. Jeremy J. Shapiro (Cambridge 14 Inwood, M. A Hegel Dictionary (Oxford Blackwell, 1992). Inwood, M. Hegel (London Routledge, 1983). Hardimon, M. O. Hegels Social Philosophy The Project of Reconciliation (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1994). Mure, G. R. G. (1965) The Philosophy of Hegel, London Pinkard T. (2000) Hegel A Biography, Cambridge Cambridge University Press Useful introduction to Hegels life and times Raymond Plant, Hegel (London Routledge, 1999). Pippin, R. B. Idealism as Modernism Hegelian Variations (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1997).Avineri, S. Hegels Theory of the Modern State, New edition (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1974). Solomon, R. (1983) In the Spirit of Hegel, Oxford Oxford University Press Stewart, J. (2000) The Unity of Hegels Phenomenology of Spirit, Evanston, IL Northwestern University Press Taylor, C. (1975) Hegel Cambridge Cambridge Un iversity Press Villa, D. (2005) Hegel, Toqueville, and Individualism, The Review of Politics, Vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 659-86 Walsh, W. H. Hegelian Ethics (Basingstoke Macmillan, 1969). Westphal, K. (2003) Hegels Epistemology, Indianapolis Hackett Allen W.Wood, Hegels Ethical Thought (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1990). Pelczynski, Z. A. (ed. ), The State and Civil Society Studies in Hegels Political Philosophy (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1984). Pelczynski, Z. A. Hegels Political Philosophy Problems and Perspectives (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1971). Marx General texts S Avineri, Social and Political Thought of Karl Marx T Bottomore (ed), A Dictionary of Marxist Thought T. Carver ed. , The Cambridge Companion to Marx T. Carver, Marxs Social Theory T. Carver, The Postmodern Marx *G Duncan, Marx and Mill M Evans, Karl Marx *I.Hampsher-Monk, Modern Political Thought Ch 10 J life-sustaining & A Reeve (eds),Modern Political Theory Section VI *D McLellan,Karl Ma rx His Life and Thought *D McLellan,The Thought of Karl Marx thematic chapters in Part 2 are extremely useful J Maguire, Marxs Theory of Politics P. Osborne How to Read Marx *P Singer, Marx (a useful, short introduction) T Sowell, Marxism, Philosophy and Economics W Suching, Marx An Introduction 15 A Wood, Karl Marx The progeny Marx and Alienation E Fromm, Marxs Concept of Man S Hook, From Hegel to Marx * D McLellan, Marx Before Marxism I Meszaros, Marxs Theory of Alienation B Ollman, Alienation D.McLennan, The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx Historical materialism & Social Change A Carter, Marx A Radical Critique T Carver, Marxs Social Theory G Cohen, Karl Marxs Theory of History A Defence M Rader, Marxs Interpretation of History Marx and Capitalism Marxist Economics A Brewer, A Guide to Marxs Capital B Fine, Theories of the Capitalist economic system A Giddens, Capitalism and Modern Social Theory E Mandel, The Formation of the Economic Thought of Karl Marx E Mandel, An Introducti on to Marxist Economic Theory T Sowell, Marxism, Philosophy and Economics Marx and ideology E. Balibar, Marx and Philosophy T.Carver, Did Ideology fall with the Wall? Marx, Marxism, Post-Marxism in M. Freeden ed. , Reassessing Political Ideologies J Lorraine, Ideology and its revisions in Contemporary Marxism in N OSullivan ed. , The Structure of Modern Ideology J. McCarney, The Real World of Ideology M. Seliger, The Marxist Concept of Ideology R. Williams, Ideology in his Keywords Marx and Engels on justice, morality, human nature and exploitation Arneson,Whats wrong with Exploitation? Ethics 91 (Jan 1981) A. Buchanan, Exploitation, Alienation and Injustice, Canadian Journal of Philosophy IX vol. Cohen, Nagel & Scanlon eds, Marx, Justice and History (esp. articles by Husain and Wood L. N. Geras,The Controversy about Marx and Justice, New Left Review 150 (1985) * N. Geras, Marx and Human Nature *S. Lukes, Marxism and Morality *K. Neilson & S. Patton eds, Marx and Morality, Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Supplement to vol. VII (1981) A. Wood, Karl Marx, pt III A. Wood, The Marxist Critique of Justice, Philosophy and Public personal business vol. 1 no. 13 (1972) 16 Young, Justice and Capitalist Production. Marx and Bourgeois Ideology, Canadian Journal of Philosophy VIII no. 13 (1978) Nietzsche *K.Ansell-Pearson, The Perfect Nihilist. An Introduction to Nietzsche as Political Thinker *K. Ansell-Pearson, Nietzsche contra Rousseau. A Study of Nietzsches Moral and Political Thought K. Ansell-Pearson, The Exotic Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche, Political Theory (Aug. 1986) *K. Ansell-Pearson, Nietzsche on Autonomy and Morality, Political Studies (June 1991) K. Ansell-Pearson, Nietzsche A Radical Challenge to Political Theory? Radical Philosophy 54 (1990) K. Ansell-Pearson, Who is the ubermensch? Time, Truth and Woman in Nietzsche Journal of the History of Ideas (April/June 1992) D. Conway, Nietzsche and the Political D.Conway, Nietzsches Dangerous Game S. J. Co leman, Nietzsche as Politique et Moraliste Journal of the History of Ideas vol. 27 (1966) G. Deleuze, Nietzsche and Philosophy challenging but brilliant D. Allison ed. , The New Nietzsche excellent but challenging collection R. Hollingdale, Nietzsche The Man and his Philosophy a readable semi-biography by one of his main English translaters W. Kaufmann, Nietzsche. Philosopher, Psychologist, and Anti-Christ It was Kaufmann who first introduced Nietzsche to many English-speaking readers, via his translations, and he who was mainly responsible for re-presenting N. s an existentialist. His work is very accessible and convincing T. Strong, Nietzsche and the Politics of metabolism (2000) good on N and Politics M. Warren, Nietzsche and Political Thought (MIT 1988) M. Warren, The Politics of Nietzsches Philosophy Nihilism, Culture and Power, Political Studies (Sept. 1985) M. Warren, Nietzsche and Political Philosophy, Political Theory vol. 13 no. 2 (May 1985) K. Higgins, Nietzsches Zarathu stra D. Owen, Nietzsche, Politics and Modernity D. Owen On the Genealogy of Morality (2007) P. Patton, Deleuze and the Political (Routledge 2000) ch. not all on Nietzsche but some very useful comparative points R. Schacht ed. , Nietzsche, Genealogy, Morality Essays on Nietzsches Genealogy of Morals B. Leiter Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Nietzsche on the Genealogy of Morality *M. Tanner, Nietzsche (1994) this is a very short and accessible introduction B. Magnus & K. Higgins ed. , The Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche esp. articles by Magnus & Higgins, Strong and Nehamas *A. Nehamas, Nietzsche Life as Literature a very useful commentary R. Soloman & K. Higgins, Reading Nietzsche E.Kennedy, Woman as Ubermensch Nietzsche, in Kennedy & Mendus eds, Women in Western Political Philosophy K. Oliver, Womanizing Nietzsche Philosophys Relation to the Feminine 17 P. Johnson, Nietzsche reception Today, Radical Philosophy 80 (Nov/Dec 1996) useful overview of literature on Nietzsches politics D. Coole, The Politics of Reading Nietzsche, Political Studies 46 (June 1998) D. Coole, Politics and Negativity (Routledge 2000) ch. 3 S. Rosen, The Mask of Enlightenment. Nietzsches Zaarathustra very detailed exposition of a major text T. Sadler, Nietzsche. Truth and Redemption.Critique of the Postmodernist Nietzsche presents a mystical, existentialist Nietzsche, based on the early writings. Readable but controversial *F. Appel, Nietzsche Contra Democracy short and clear. Argues that Nietzsche is a constitutional anti-democrat Additional thematic sources Many of the sources already listed by thinker have useful material on the themes for the extended essay. The sources below provide general compass and additional material. As a general starting point Goodin and Pettit (eds) A companion to contemporary political philosophy (Blackwell, 1995) has useful chapters on most of these themes.Remember that texts from last term will also be relevant. Freedom Connolly, William, The Terms of Political Discourse (1983), chapter 4 Coole, Diana, Constructing and Deconstructing Liberty, Political Studies 411 (1993) reprinted in P. Dunleavy et al. (eds. ), British Political Science Green, T. H. , Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract, in Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligations and Other Writings Miller, David, Liberty Ramsay, Maureen Whats Wrong with liberalism? (1997) Ch 2 Riley, Jonathan, Liberty, in Catriona McKinnon (ed. , Issues in Political Theory Ryan, Alan (ed. ), The Idea of Freedom Swift, Adam, Political Philosophy, (Polity, 2001) part 2 Taylor, Charles, Whats Wrong with Negative Liberty? , in A. Ryan (ed. ), The Idea of Freedom and in D. Miller, Liberty. Human nature Davies, J. , Human nature in politics (Wiley, 1963) Forbes, I. , and Smith, S. , (eds) Politics and human nature (1983) Parekh, Bikhu, Rethinking Multiculturalism. MacMillan Basingtoke, 2000. Chapter 4. Pinker, S. , The blank slate the modern denial of human nature (2003) Rosen, M. , & Wolff, J. , Political Thought.Oxford Oxford UP, 1999, Chapter 1. Sayers, S. , Marxism and human nature (Routledge, 2007) 18 Morality K. Ansell-Pearson, Nietzsche contra Rousseau. A Study of Nietzsches Moral and Political Thought Berki, N. , and Parekh, B. The morality of politics (1972) S. Lukes, Marxism and Morality Nuttall, J Moral Questions an introduction to ethics (Polity, 1993) Ch 13 Raz, J. , The morality of freedom (Clarendon, 1986) Raz, J. , Ethics in the public domain the morality of law and politics (OUP 1994) equation Arneson . , RJ Equality in Goodin and Pettit Pojman, L. and R. Westmoreland (eds. , Equality Selected Readings Rees, John, Equality (Pall Mall Press, 1971) Sen, A. , Inequality Re-examined Sen, A. , Equality of What? , in Choice, Welfare and Measurement Tawney, R. H. , Equality, (1931) especially particle on Liberty and Equality Swift, Adam, Political Philosophy, esp Part 3 (Polity, 2001) Tawney RH Equality (Allen and Unwin, 1931) White S. , Equality ( Polity, 2007) Political authority and legitimacy Dunn, J Political obligation in its historical context (CUP 1980) Flathman. , R Legitimacy in Goodin and Pettit (eds) A companion to contemporary political philosophy (Blackwell, 1995) Flathman, R. The practice of political authority (Univ of Chicago Press, 1980) Green , L. , The authority of the state (Clarendon 1988) Green TH Lectures on the principles of political obligation and other writings (CUP, 1986) Hampton, J. , Contract and consent, Ch 16 in Goodin and Pettit (eds) Lessnoff, M. , Social contract theory (Blackwell, 1990) Morris ,C. , (ed) The social contract theorists critical essays on Hobbes Locke and Rousseau (1998) Pateman, C Participation and democratic theory (CUP, 1970) Pateman The problems of political obligation (CUP, 1985) Plamenatz, J. Consent, freedom and political obligation (OUP, 1968) Riley P. , Will and political legitimacy a critical exposition of social contract theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Kant and He gel ( Harvard University Press, 1982) Simmons, AJ. , Moral principles and political obligations (Princeton Univ Press, 1979) Warrender, J The political philosophy of Hobbes his theory of obligation (Clarendon, 1957) Please note if locating material for a topic is difficult please ask your tutor for further suggestions. 19 10. SEMINAR PREPARATION SCHEDULE hebdomad 1 Introduction to the module.Benthams utilitarianism Essential Reading Jeremy Bentham, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, chapters I, IV, VII, XIV (in Wootton). Please bring your copy of the David Wootton volume to class with you. Questions to guide your reading and for seminar discussion 1. What does Bentham mean when he says that mankind is governed by pain and pleasure? 2. What is the principle of utility? 3. Why does Bentham accept that it can provide an objective measure by which our actions can be judged? What type of ethical theory is utilitarianism? What is its relationship to morality? . What, if any, are the political implications of utilitarianism? Week 2 John Stuart Mills Liberalism Essential Reading John Stuart Mill, On Liberty. Please bring your copy of the David Wootton volume to class with you. Questions to guide your reading and for seminar discussion 1. Why does J. S. Mill believe that it is important to define the nature and limits of power? 2. What is J. S. Mills one very simple principle? How simple is it? And how can it be applied? 3. What justification does Mill provide for freedom of expression of opinion? How convincing do you find it? 4.Why does Mill believe that individuality is one of the elements of well-being? What does he mean when he says that human beings can become a noble and beautiful object of contemplation? Short in-class or post-class writing task write some notes in answer to the following How does Mills understanding of freedom differ from or develop the ideas of the thinkers we examine last semester? Week 3 Kants Enlightenment Essen tial Reading 20 Immanuel Kant, An Answer to the Question What is Enlightenment? (Wootton pp. 522-526) Please bring your copy of the David Wootton volume with you to class.Questions to guide your reading and for seminar discussion 1. How does Kant define Enlightenment? 2. How is enlightenment attained and what is its significance? 3. What are the obstacles to Enlightenment and how can they be overcome? 4. What is the relationship of Enlightenment to freedom? Week 4 Hegel and the State Essential Reading G. W. F. Hegel, Elements of the Philosophy of Right, (Cambridge, CUP, 1991) Part 3 Ethical life, Section 2, Civil Society, pp. 220-39) On QM+. The editors introduction by Allen Wood is also very useful. Please focus especially on the following sections 188 C. The Police and the Corporation 230, a.The Police 231-249 b. The Corporation (250-256). Section 3, The State 257-259. Questions to guide your reading and for seminar discussion 1. What does Hegel understand by civilian society (1 88)? 2. What is the role of the police (231-49)? 3. What is the relationship between the family and civil society and the family and the state (231-256)? 4. How is the relationship between individual and civil society different from that of individual and the state (258)? 5. What does Hegel think the relationship is between freedom and the state (258)? Do not be worried if you find these questions difficult to answer when reading on your own.We will try to answer them together in the seminar. Week 5 The early Marx This is the first of three sessions on Marx. In order to understand the context of his ideas, his career and political commitments, it will help you a great deal to do some general introductory reading on Marx from the list below over the next three weeks to support your reading of the primary texts. These are all accessible and clear introductions to Marx work. Class discussion will focus on the primary text, and you must bring a copy of the Wootton text with you each wee k and prepare some answers to the questions that will form the basis of discussion. 1 P. Singer, Marx. A Very Short Introduction (OUP) David McLellan, Karl Marx His life and thought Hampsher Monk, A History of Modern Political Thought (Blackwell), Chapter 10, Karl Marx, especially section on Early life and influences Francis Wheen, Karl Marx (Fourth Estate) (a lively short biography) The texts we will read this week are drawn from Marx early work. We will consider his critique of liberal rights and freedom, and then look in detail at his concepts of species-being and alienation, as expressed in the 1844 Manuscripts, often known as the genus Paris Manuscripts.Essential Reading i. Sections from On the Jewish Question Wootton pp 742-747 (first column and top 2 lines of second column) pp750 (Bottom first column According to Bauer .. )-754 (first half of column 1). ii. Contribution to the Critique of Hegels Philosophy of Right Wootton pp. 758-765. You need only read the section on pp. 76 4-5, where Marx derives the proletariat. iii. The 1844 Paris Manuscripts. Section on Alienated Labour in Wootton pp. 766-772. Questions to guide your reading and for seminar discussion 1. Why does Marx remark liberalism?What has he to say about the rights of man? 2. What kind of emancipation, and from what, is Marx calling for here? 3. Why is the proletariat that will be the privileged agency of emancipation, according to Marx? The Paris Manuscripts 4. What does Marx mean by alienation? What forms does it take? What is wrong with alienation? 5. Why is Marx critical of private property? What is its relation to alienation? 6. What does Marx mean by species-being? Do you think Marx has a theory of human nature here? 7. What does Marx mean when he claims that communism will even emancipate the human senses?Short in-class or post-class writing task Write a few bullet points in answer to one of the following How does Marxs view of human nature/ spunk differ from other thinkers youve stud ied? What do you think freedom might consist of for Marx? Week 6 Historical Materialism and the Dialectic Essential Reading i. The German Ideology Part 1 (Wootton pp775-787 up to as the history of communism proves) ii. Theses on Feuerbach (Wootton pp 773-4) iii. Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (Woottton pp. 829-831) iv. Manifesto of the Communist Party Parts 1,2,4 (Wootton pp. 98-809 and pp. 814 -815). 22 Questions to guide your reading and for seminar discussion 1. What is materialism? 2. What makes Marx materialism historical? What drives history, according to Marx? 3. What is the relationship between forces and social relations of production, and between base and superstructure? What is a mode of production? 4. To what extent can human action shape history, according to Marx? How does class struggle suffer in here? 5. What is ideology and what is its function? 6. How might a revolution come about, in Marx view?Short in class or post-class writing t ask Write a paragraph on how Marxs view of history challenges the justifications for political authority advanced by other thinkers previously studied on the course. Week 7 Reading Week Week 8 The Analysis of Capitalism. Essential reading Wootton contains very little of Capital. Essential reading for this week is taken from Tucker The Marx Engels Reader (Norton, 1978) and can be found on the module QM+ site. i. The Coming Upheaval Tucker pp. 218-9 ii. Capital vol. 1 Pt I ch. 1 sect. 1 (Tucker pp. 302-8) sect. 2 (Tucker pp. 308-312) sect. 4 (Tucker pp. 319-29) ch. VI (pp. 336-343) Pt III ch.VII sect. 2 (pp. 351-361) ch. X sect. 2 (pp. 364-7) Ch. XIII, esp. sects 4,5 (pp. 392-403) Pt V ch. XVI (pp. 417-9) ch. XXV sect. 4 (pp. 429-431) Pt VIII (pp. 431-8) iii. Capital vol. 3 (pp. 439-442) iv. Crisis Theory Final section (pp. 459-65) Questions to guide your reading and for seminar discussion 1. What is Marxs theory of value? What do the terms use value, exchange value and surplus value mean and how do they relate to one another? 2. What is the twofold character of labour? 3. What does Marx mean by the fetishism of commodities? 4. What are the contradictions and crises that Marx finds inherent in capitalism? . How does the proletariats exploitation occur? 6. What does the analysis of capitalism show us about the dialectical method? Is this still relevant as a way of reading the present? 7. How convincing do you find Marxs analysis of capitalism? Short in class or post-class writing task Write a paragraph summarising your understanding of Marx views on either a) morality or b) equality. 23 Week 9 Nietzsches Genealogy of Morality I Background to Nietzsche As a preparation for studying Nietzsche, you are advised to read K. Ansell-Pearson, The Perfect Nihilist. An Introduction to Nietzsche as Political Thinker (CUP 1994).D. Conway, Nietzsche and the Political (Routledge 1996), is a possible alternative but rather misleadingly reconstructive as an introductory text. Bot h of these books nevertheless offer accessible introductions to Nietzsche, with particular emphasis on his political dimension. A useful introductory essay to his writings can also be found in B. Magnus & K. Higgins, Nietzsches Works and their Themes in The Cambridge Companion to Nietzsche (CUP 1996), which can be found on Moodle Wootton (ed) contains only the first essay of the Genealogy of Morality so you will definitely need access to another copy too.Key readings not in Wootton, as well as helpful supplementary readings are available on QM+. The Cambridge University Press edition of the Genealogy is a very good one if you wish to buy a copy. In addition, it would be very useful if you were to look at Beyond Good and Evil. Essential Reading Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morality Preface Essay 1. Please focus especially on sections 2,7,10,11,12,13 and pay especial attention to section 13. On the Genealogy of Morality 1. How does Nietzsche distinguish between good/evil and good/bad?Expla in how the latter gave way to the former and the type of persons which were classified under each heading. Which civilisations outfit to these categories? 2. What is the meaning and significance of ressentiment and the herd instinct? How do they differ from what is noble and the aristrocratic way of life? What do you think it means in this context to say yes to life? 3. What has been the fate of we modern Europeans, according to Nietzsche? 4. What is Nietzsche criticising in Essay 1, section 13? Nietzsche alludes here to the will to power what sense can you gain of it?Week 10 Nietzsches Genealogy of Morality II Essential Reading Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morality Essay 2, sections 1,2,3,7,11,12,16,17,18,24,25. Please pay especial attention to section 12, which we will read together in class. ii. Nietzsche, sections on nihilism from Will to Power available on QM+ Questions to guide your reading and for seminar discussion 1. What developments would have to occur before the human sp ecies is capable of entering a social contract? How does Nietzsche believe they were brought about? 24 2. In what sense can these developments be called nihilistic? 3.Explain what Nietzsche is tell about his method and about will to power, in Essay 2, section 12. What does this add to his former analysis of punishment? 4. How does bad conscience arise? What are its consequences? 5. Who is the man of the future? What sort of redemption might he permit? Short in class or post-class writing task Write a short paragraph or a few bullet points in answer to one (or more) of the following questions. How does Nietzsches understanding of morality differ from that of other thinkers you have studied? How does he pose a challenge to thinking about morality as an intrinsic part of human nature?How do you think Nietzsche understands freedom? How might freedom be tied to power? Can Nietzsches philosophy be reconciled with the concept of equality? Again, try to think about his difference/connectio n with other thinkers covered on the course. Week 11 Nietzsches Genealogy of Morality III Essential Readings i. Nietzsche, The Genealogy of Morality Essay 3. Please focus on sections 1,8, 12 to end ii. Sections from Thus Spake Zarathustra (Wooton only contains first two essays so both of these will be available on QM+). Questions to guide your reading and for seminar discussion 1.What is the ascetic ideal? Why is it nihilistic? What role do philosophy and religion respectively play in its promotion? 2. What do you think Nietzsche means by Life? How does the ascetic ideal both threaten and preserve it? 3. What is the relationship between knowledge and will? Why is everything a matter of perspective? 4. Why does Nietzsche call man the sick animal? 5. What is the herd instinct? How does it help modern individuals to cope with their distortion? 6. What examples does Nietzsche give of modern no-sayers? 7. What is the will to true statement? 8.What are the different meanings and symptom s that Nietzsche attributes to nihilism? 9. What is will to power? In what sense is it unconscious? How does it relate to the will to truth? 10. What role is played by Zarathustra and what is his relationship to the Dionysian? Why does Nietzsche suggest he has come too soon? Week 12 Research essay workshop This weeks seminar will take the form of a collaborative workshop intended to help you in preparing and drafting your research essay. By the end of the session you should have a firm gloss and essay structure in place, and be ready to begin writing (if you havent already). 5 Essential preparation using the feedback on your essay plan, begin sketching out the structure and content of your essay in more detail. What will be your final choice of theme and thinkers? What main differences/similarities have you identified in the different thinkers treatment of your chosen theme? What will your final essay title be? What are the key primary and secondary texts you are using? You should be prepared to share your work and ideas with other students and to offer constructive criticism of the work of others.IMPORTANT if for any reason you are unable to attend this workshop you MUST notify your tutor. 26 Appendix I MPT II Assessment PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE WILL BE A BRIEFING SESSION ON THE ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL STUDENTS ON THURSDAY 18 JANUARY AT 1PM IN ROOM FB113A Overview This semester, assessment consists of the following two pieces of work (i) an essay proposal of max 500 words, plus working bibliography and (ii) a research essay of max. 5000 words. There is no exam for this module. The research essay is designed to allow you to demonstrate both depth and breadth in your understanding of the semesters thinkers.It is also intended to help develop your skills of research design and independent research, in order to prepare you for the final year dissertation you will undertake next year. You are required to choose one from a selection of key themes, and to wri te an essay that compares and analyses the treatment of your chosen theme by at least three of the thinkers covered in this module. The choice of thinkers will depend on the theme chosen and your own interests, with one stipulation at least two must be chosen from the Spring Semester (for Semester B associates all will be chosen from the Spring Semester).The themes from which to choose are 1) freedom 2) human nature 3) morality/ethics 4) equality 5) political authority and legitimacy. The requirement to submit a plan and working bibliography is intended to ensure that your choice of themes and thinkers is appropriate, to help you in framing your arguments, and to give you the opportunity to receive feedback on your work in progress from your seminar tutor. Your tutors will also incorporate short writing exercises into classes to help you link themes and thinkers as we progress through the course. Suggested exercises are include in this handbook.Your work will be assessed according t o the general assessment criteria set out in the Politics Student Handbook, however you should also pay careful attention to the specific requirements of the tasks set out below. Coursework 1 Research essay plan and working bibliography Deadline 9am Thursday 7 March 2013 (Week 9) 27 Title MPT II research essay plan (also give proposed title of your research essay) Word length Maximum 500 words not including bibliography. Weighting 10% of the overall course mark for MPT (15% for single semester associate students).Task Your 500 word plan must do the following submit a working title for your essay (see end of this appendix for example title formats) Introduce your chosen theme and give a brief rationale for your choice of thinkers Set out an indicative structure for your essay Give an indication of the main similarities/differences between the thinkers in terms of your chosen theme, and/or indicate your overall argument Your working bibliography must Contain both primary texts and s econdary sources Show that you have identified sufficient relevant sources to assist in the research and writing of your essay Be properly and accurately presented, adhering to scholarly conventions MPT II Coursework 2 Research essay Deadline 9am Tuesday 23 April 2013 (revision week) Title Give the finalised title of your essay Word Length Maximum 5000 words including footnotes, excluding bibliography Weighting 50% of the overall module mark for MPT (85% for single semester associate students) Task The essay must Demonstrate that you have read and understood a range of primary and secondary texts studied in the module. Clearly show the relevance of your chosen thinkers to the theme selected Use analytical and critical skills to explore similarities/differences/complementarities between the thinkers 28Advance and sustain an overall argument Be properly and accurately presented and referenced, and contain a full bibliography Advice and guidance This research essay is not simply a long er version of the ordinary undergraduate essay. It is more in the nature of a guide research project, and thus requires more of you. You contribute to the design of the topic or question, and you will need to be more independent in identifying and selecting relevant source material. The number of sources consulted will be greater than for the average 2000-3000 word essay. A longer piece of work requires you to develop your points and arguments in greater detail and depth, and it may also be more difficult to structure.Therefore please pay attention to the following suggestions, and ask your seminar tutor or course convenor for help if anything is unclear. Getting started Do NOT leave all the preparatory work for this essay until the week before you have to hand in your plan You need to be thinking from an early stage about what themes and thinkers interest you, and you should make notes, week by week, on how the different thinkers relate to the various themes. Some short exercises are included in this handbook to help you do this these may be done in class with help from your tutor, but should also be used after class to help you build up a set of thematic notes.Designing your topic It is crucial that your choice of theme and thinkers is coherent. Whatever theme you choose, you should start by iden